Monday 15 November 2021

The Global Supply Chain Crisis Is Creating Opportunities For Innovation In Sustainability

The Global Supply Chain Crisis Is Creating Opportunities For Innovation In Sustainability

 


The current supply chain crisis due to the Covid-19 pandemic has created a sense of urgency for companies to rethink their supply chains and the way they work with their factories and vendors.

How does this global disruption create opportunities for sustainability? The short answer is that it creates opportunities through simplification, such as simplification in raw materials, packaging, local manufacturing, inventions in new material, circular consumption and so on. As we shift from brick-and-mortar to e-commerce, sustainability has important implications for the upcoming holiday season. Let's explore these areas in detail.

 

Ctrl + Shift To E-Commerce

In retail, the pandemic forced many companies to shut down operations for weeks or months. These disruptions created a significant opportunity for e-commerce companies that were able to quickly operate warehouses and replenish stock. Efficient operations will be especially important when supply chains get strained from Black Friday through Cyber Monday and beyond.

The growth of e-commerce and the move to online retail has actually helped companies that handle their own distribution, such as Amazon. Traditional retailers have been forced to adapt by becoming more efficient with their operations and leveraging technology in order to compete. At my company, we've seen tremendous growth in e-commerce across nearly all market segments, and we expect this trend to continue.

Another advantage for large e-commerce companies, like Amazon, is that they can use their size and scale to improve efficiencies and provide added services, including supply chain management, customer service, returns processing, payments processing and so on. All of this helps them gain further competitive advantages over traditional retailers.

Global disruption and its big impact on sustainability.


Companies are dealing with labor shortages, material constraints, equipment issues and shipping capacity constraints. If retailers can't manage their existing inventories effectively or adjust their product offerings quickly enough — or if there is a disruption in production or shipping — they risk losing customers permanently.

This disruption is directly impacting consumers, and increasing their awareness of the supply chain. At the same time, sustainability is becoming a bigger part of the conversation, whether it's about local manufacturing or slower and more efficient deliveries. Consumers are voting with their wallets for companies that prioritize sustainability and transparency.

One obvious benefit of the shift to e-commerce is that digital companies don’t need as much shelf space to stock inventory. Since consumers are buying directly online, packages no longer need to be designed with the shelf in mind. Instead, the focus can be on getting the product to customers as efficiently as possible.

That said, increasing demand and deliveries is highly carbon-intensive. To mitigate these issues, brands need to invest in smarter software and more efficient supply chains. They need to also look at their product design and packaging and think about how they can reduce waste and use less packaging. All of these things add up.

Some brands are also offering slower deliveries to offset carbon footprint and waste. Brands can include their sustainability measures in their descriptions, packaging, ads and so on to inform customers about the impact of their choices.

Brands can also educate consumers about the carbon effects of their purchases. For instance, companies can provide customers with information on how to offset the impact of their purchase (such as by funding reforestation projects).

As McKinsey reports, packaging-related sustainability initiatives include eliminating unnecessary packaging, increasing the use of recycled content, using more mono-materials and more.

The end result is that companies can reduce the carbon footprint of their operations by using fewer materials and less energy per package. This is becoming increasingly important, given that companies are strengthening their sustainability initiatives. Amazon, for instance, has announced that it aims for 50% of shipments to be net-zero carbon by 2040.

 

Sustainability In The Holiday Season

Companies are also realizing that sustainability is important for their brand. Many have created sustainability reports to demonstrate how they are improving the environmental impact of their operations over time. This creates an opportunity to highlight those improvements in the lead-up to the holiday season.

Another way to achieve greater sustainability is the reduction of SKUs, which also addresses supply chain shortages and minimizes out-of-stock items. Instead of selling every possible combination of features, companies can emphasize multiple use cases to maximize the sell-through of an SKU. For example, a consumer goods brand could market a blender for the purpose of making juices, soups and smoothies, helping to maximize sell-through.

Additionally, companies can bundle multiple orders to reduce the number of shipments. Similarly, as an example of the circular economy, brands can reuse and recycle package materials where possible.\

Consumers have become much savvier about where products come from and who makes them — especially when buying gifts for family members or close friends who care about these topics. And retail consumers are increasingly looking for brands with a strong social and environmental commitment, which can help boost sales as well as reputation among other customers.

Ultimately, while global disruption is creating some uncertainty in the short-term, the long-term trend is toward more sustainability. This is creating opportunities for companies that are willing to embrace change and lead by example.

Monday 1 November 2021

All about the Catastrophic & Crazy California Port fees

All about the Catastrophic & Crazy California Port fees


On 29th October, two days after the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach announced a surprise emergency fee for containers dwelling too long at terminals, the National Shippers Advisory Council (NSAC) held its inaugural meeting. NSAC, created to advise the Federal Maritime Commission, is composed of 12 U.S. importers and 12 exporters. Members include heavy hitters like Amazon (NYSE: AMZN), Walmart (NYSE: WMT), Target (NYSE: TGT), Office Depot (NASDAQ: ODP) and IKEA. Council members had a lot to say about the California port fees — none of it good.

Starting November 1st, the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach will charge $100 per container for boxes dwelling nine or more days that move by truck and those dwelling six days or more that move by rail. The fee will increase $100 every day. It will be charged to carriers, which will then almost certainly pass the fee along to shippers, meaning it will be the equivalent of an escalating demurrage charge.

“As far as the ‘hyper-demurrage’ announced in Los Angeles/Long Beach, I think it will be catastrophic,” said Rich Roche, vice president of international transportation at Mohawk Global Logistics, during the NSAC meeting.



“Chassis are already in short supply and this will artificially suck out the rest of the containers that may be sitting in there [at terminals] that didn’t need to be on a chassis and now they’re going to be parked somewhere. It’s probably going to wipe out whatever’s left in terms of chassis,” predicted Roche. According to Steve Hughes, representing the Motor Equipment & Manufacturing Association, “I’m concerned that this new fee is going to cause even more problems than it’s going to solve. I understand the logic behind it and it makes some sense, but unfortunately, because we don’t have the throughput at the front gate, I think this can cause us more problems than we have already.”

Bob Connor, executive vice president of global transportation at Mallory Alexander International Logistics, said, “This absolutely came out of left field. I don’t see this charge doing anything but adding more cost, and freight rates being what they are, this is the last thing we need.”

 

 

Carriers to pass along fees to shippers/BCOs

NSAC members speaking during Wednesday’s meeting emphasized that the Los Angeles/Long Beach charges will ultimately be paid by shippers.

Daniel Miller, global container lead at Cargill, dubbed California’s emergency charges “crazy fees” and said, “We know this is all going to come back to us. I had a couple of calls with carriers yesterday and they have already admitted that yes, they are going to come back to us.”

Rick DiMaio, senior vice president of supply chain operations for Office Depot, said, “All fines and fees flow to us, to the BCOs / beneficial cargo owner.”

According to Ken O’Brien, president of Gemini Shippers Group, “What was done this week at the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach is effectively an indirect tax on the American consumer.”

 

Connor said that it was his understanding that the ports could implement the charge without that notice, but carriers would have to give 30-day notice to shippers. However, that’s not the case if carriers already have language in tariffs allowing them to pass along port charges immediately. Ocean carrier HMM’s current tariff includes a clause that states, “The shipper shall be liable for payment of any charges or surcharges imposed on the carrier by any marine terminal, port authority, government authorities or other third party.”

In an online post explaining the clause, Stephen Nothdurft, vice president of the Midwest region at HMM, said, “This new charge [by Los Angeles/Long Beach] is going to be a pass-through for all of the ocean carriers. The carriers will hit the mark with the invoices. As it relates to HMM specifically, this was created based on the strong chance of such surcharges. Such fees have been blowing in the wind for quite some time, so any carrier would be astute to protect their interests.”

 

 

Do Port Demurrage fees incentivize faster moves?

The point of the “Hail Mary” Los Angeles/Long Beach fee plan is to forcibly unclog the terminals and get containers moving faster. The members of NSAC argued that these emergency port fees — as with traditional demurrage and detention fees — are not increasing container velocity given the current supply chain situation.

According to Miller, “I don’t think anybody on this committee would admit to using the port to let containers sit there because they want to. Everybody has the full intention to get these containers out, but they physically can’t.”

Adnan Qadri, director of global imports at Amazon, said, “In the past, the whole idea of detention and demurrage was incentivizing faster turns, returning of equipment and bringing fluidity into the network and the supply chain. But in its current state, the way supply chains are moving right now, I don’t think detention and demurrage are incentivizing anything.

 

“Folks are not sitting on returns because they want to. They’re sitting on them because they can’t get those containers returned. It is very difficult for us [Amazon] to wrap our heads around the idea of these detention and demurrage charges, which don’t drive any kind of positive behavior [given] the way the supply chain is currently set up.  “What concerns me is that these charges aren’t driving any benefit to the current state we’re in,” said the Amazon executive.

Carriers’ demurrage and detention fees have faced heavy criticism over the past year. They are a focus of FMC regulators as well as proposed legislation to reform the Ocean Shipping Act. And yet, the Los Angeles/Long Beach plan, with the explicit blessing of the Biden administration, will have the same effect as demurrage. It’s ironic that the international community has been pleading to the government about the absurdity of demurrage/detention charges only to have said government administer more of the same.

 

#Amazon #containershipping #FederalMaritimeCommission #IKEA #ocean #containershipping #Walmart