Monday, 15 December 2025

Imported Food Compliance in India: Batch Numbers, Best Before Dates and the Bill of Entry Explained


Imported Food Compliance in India: Batch Numbers, Best Before Dates and the Bill of Entry Explained
FSSAI requirements, documentation expectations, and the role of the Bill of Entry

In the import of food products into India, compliance failures rarely arise from unsafe goods alone. More often, they stem from incomplete traceability. A missing batch number, an unclear best before date, or inconsistent documentation can halt a consignment even when the product itself meets all safety standards.

India’s food import regime, governed by the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India, places traceability at the centre of enforcement. Understanding how FSSAI norms interact with customs procedures is therefore essential for importers, logistics providers, and customs brokers alike.

This article examines when batch, lot and best before details are mandatory, where they must appear, and whether the Bill of Entry is legally required to carry them.

Why FSSAI places emphasis on batch and shelf-life information

Under the Food Safety and Standards Act, food safety is not limited to composition or hygiene. It also includes the ability to trace food back to its source. Batch and lot numbers are the mechanism that makes recalls possible. Best before and use by dates protect consumers from degraded or unsafe food.

FSSAI’s approach is product-centric. The primary obligation lies on the food itself and its labeling. However, during imports, documentation becomes the first point of verification, which is why authorities increasingly scrutinise shipment papers for these details.

Mandatory labeling requirements under FSSAI for imported food

FSSAI regulations require every packaged food item, whether manufactured in India or imported, to carry the following on its label:

Name of the food

List of ingredients

Net quantity

Name and address of manufacturer and importer

Country of origin for imported food

Batch number, lot number, or code number

Date of manufacture or packing

Best before or use by date


For imported food, these details may appear on the original label or be added through rectification or relabeling in a bonded warehouse, subject to approval by the authorised officer.

Batch or lot numbers are not optional. At least one traceability identifier must be present on the label in a clear and legible manner.

Shelf-life requirements at the time of import

FSSAI mandates that imported food must have a valid remaining shelf life at the time of import. While the exact percentage may vary by product category or specific order, expired food or food nearing expiry without adequate remaining life is liable for rejection.

This makes the best before or use by date a critical compliance element at the import stage. Authorities routinely verify this during document scrutiny and physical inspection.

Do FSSAI norms require batch or best before details on shipment documents

Strictly speaking, FSSAI regulations do not prescribe a mandatory format for commercial invoices, packing lists, or Bills of Entry. Their legal focus remains on labeling.

However, FSSAI import clearance operates through a risk-based assessment system, where officers examine documents to determine whether sampling, testing, or inspection is required. In this process, batch and shelf-life details become operationally significant.

If shipment documents do not clearly indicate batch numbers or best before dates, officers may:

Seek clarifications

Order additional inspection

Insist on label verification through physical examination

Delay clearance pending compliance confirmation


As a result, while not explicitly mandated in writing, inclusion of these details in shipment documents has become an accepted compliance expectation under FSSAI import procedures.

The Bill of Entry and its legal scope
The Bill of Entry is a customs document governed by customs law, not food law. Its primary function is assessment of duty, classification, and import eligibility.

There is no statutory requirement under FSSAI or customs law to declare batch number, lot number, or best before date as compulsory fields in the Bill of Entry.

However, customs authorities act as the implementing arm for FSSAI at ports. When food items are flagged for FSSAI clearance, officers may request supporting information even if it is not a predefined Bill of Entry field.

Many importers therefore voluntarily include batch or lot information in the goods description section of the Bill of Entry, particularly for regulated food categories.

This is a compliance strategy, not a legal mandate.

Recommended document format aligned with FSSAI expectations

To align with FSSAI norms and minimise clearance delays, the following format is widely considered best practice.

Commercial Invoice
Product name and brand
HS code
Batch or lot number
Date of manufacture or packing
Best before or use by date
Net quantity
Country of origin

Packing List
Package or pallet number
Product description
Batch or lot number
Quantity per batch
Gross and net weight

Bill of Entry (Description Field)
Product name and brand
Packaging type
Net quantity
Batch or lot number (recommended, not mandatory)

For consignments involving multiple batches, a separate annexure titled “Batch and Shelf-Life Details” should be referenced consistently across all documents.

FSSAI inspection and ground-level enforcement reality

In practice, FSSAI officers place strong emphasis on consistency. The batch number on the label should match the batch number on the invoice or annexure. The best before date should logically align with the manufacturing date. Discrepancies, even minor ones, often lead to sampling or reinspection.

Importers who rely solely on minimum legal requirements frequently encounter delays. Those who proactively disclose batch and shelf-life details across documents generally experience smoother clearance.

Conclusion
Under FSSAI norms, batch or lot numbers and best before dates are mandatory for imported food products at the labeling level. While the law does not compel their declaration on every shipment document or the Bill of Entry, enforcement practice strongly favours transparency and traceability.

In the Indian food import environment, compliance is no longer just about meeting the rules. It is about demonstrating control.


---

Recommendation
For food imports into India, always align your documentation with FSSAI’s traceability philosophy. Include batch or lot numbers and best before dates on invoices and packing lists, and reference them in the Bill of Entry wherever feasible. This approach goes beyond bare compliance and significantly reduces regulatory friction at the port.




Disclaimer

This article is intended solely for general informational purposes and does not constitute legal, regulatory, or professional advice of any kind. The content is based on laws, regulations, and administrative practices as generally understood at the time of writing; however, such laws, interpretations, and enforcement practices are subject to change and may vary by jurisdiction, port, or authority.


The author makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, or current applicability of the information contained herein, and expressly disclaims all liability for any loss, damage, delay, penalty, or adverse consequence arising directly or indirectly from the use of, reliance upon, or interpretation of this article.


Readers are strongly advised to seek independent professional advice and to verify applicable legal and regulatory requirements with the appropriate authorities before acting on the basis of the information provided. The views expressed are solely those of the author and do not purport to represent any official position of any regulatory or governmental body.


Friday, 12 December 2025

ISO 14083 Certification: The New Global Benchmark for Transport Emissions



ISO 14083 has rapidly emerged as the world’s primary standard for calculating and reporting greenhouse-gas emissions from transport chains. Published in 2023 and now adopted across major logistics networks, the standard brings long-needed consistency to an area long plagued by fragmented methods, varying assumptions and non-comparable carbon figures. As pressure intensifies on supply chains to demonstrate credible climate performance, ISO 14083 is quickly becoming essential for companies seeking transparency, compliance and competitive advantage.

Why ISO 14083 matters now?
Transport emissions form one of the most complex parts of corporate carbon accounting. Goods may move through multiple countries, modes and subcontractors. Until recently, different companies used their own formulas, leading to wide discrepancies in results. ISO 14083 provides a uniform, auditable methodology that ensures emissions for every leg, mode and handling operation can be calculated in a comparable way.

Its importance has grown sharply over the past year. Large buyers now routinely request ISO-aligned emissions reporting from logistics partners. Several national and regional regulators, particularly in Europe, are incorporating requirements for transparent, standardised carbon disclosure in freight. As decarbonisation deadlines approach, companies can no longer afford vague or inconsistent reporting. ISO 14083 has become the shared language the sector was missing.

What the standard actually covers
ISO 14083 sets out rules for calculating emissions from the full movement of goods and people across road, rail, sea and air. It defines boundaries, data requirements and allocation methods clearly, ensuring that every tonne of emissions is accounted for consistently.

Key elements include:
Activity-based calculations: It prioritises real operational data such as fuel consumption, electricity used, distance travelled and load factors.

Treatment of complex journeys: Multi-leg routes, intermodal transfers and hub activities are handled using uniform rules that avoid double counting.

Emission factors: It provides guidance on selecting appropriate and up-to-date factors for fuels, electricity and energy sources.

Data quality tiers: Companies can start with representative or modelled data and move progressively toward higher accuracy as systems improve.


Industry uptake and tools
Since late 2023 and throughout 2024–25, adoption has accelerated. Global logistics giants, postal operators, major freight forwarders and e-commerce supply chains have already aligned their calculators to ISO 14083. Industry frameworks such as the GLEC Framework have been updated to maintain compatibility, and certification bodies now offer ISO 14083 conformity assessments.

Digital tools have also evolved quickly. Many transport management systems and carbon-accounting platforms now include ISO 14083-aligned modules, enabling firms to shift from spreadsheet-based estimation to automated, auditable reporting. This has made implementation more practical even for smaller operators.

Practical implications for companies

Implementing ISO 14083 typically requires three steps:

1. Strengthen data capture
Organisations must gather high-quality data on fuel, distance, payload, equipment type and route specifics. Partner and subcontractor data sharing becomes crucial.


2. Integrate systems
ISO 14083 works best when transport management, telematics, fleet systems and carbon tools are connected. Reducing manual inputs improves accuracy and auditability.


3. Establish governance
Companies increasingly appoint a single process owner for emissions accounting, supported by internal audits or third-party verification. Buyers now expect documented evidence of methodology and data quality.



Common challenges
Many companies encounter similar hurdles:

Incomplete data from carriers, especially for subcontracted legs. Templates and contractual requirements are becoming standard solutions.

Electricity-based transport complexity as the carbon intensity of grid power varies widely by region and hour. Firms must choose representative and current factors.

Handling multimodal and cross-border journeys where data formats and units differ.

Cost pressures for smaller carriers implementing new digital tools or verification processes.


Industry groups are publishing step-by-step guidance emphasising practical, phased adoption rather than perfection on day one.

What’s next
The momentum behind ISO 14083 is strengthening. Over the next year, expect:

Greater regulatory alignment as governments incorporate standardised transport emission accounting into disclosure rules.

More buyer-driven enforcement, with ISO-aligned reporting becoming a default requirement in procurement.

Continued harmonisation with sector tools and calculators, making implementation smoother and reducing duplication of reporting efforts.

Rising demand for certified conformity, especially in international freight where trust and comparability are crucial.


ISO 14083 is also becoming a foundation for optimisation. Once emissions are measured consistently, companies can pinpoint hotspots such as empty runs, inefficient modes and high-emission routes — enabling targeted decarbonisation initiatives.

Recommendations
Companies operating or relying on logistics networks should adopt ISO 14083 immediately. Begin by mapping your top transport lanes, identify where accurate data already exists, and upgrade systems to capture fuel, electricity and load information automatically. Use an ISO-aligned calculator, mandate data templates for partners and appoint a dedicated owner for verification. Early adopters will not only meet incoming compliance expectations but also gain operational insights and reputational advantages.